meeeekmill
06.11.2019 •
Business
From an initial equilibrium in the ad-as model, an increase in consumption growth will initially cause inflation:
a. and real growth to remain unchanged.
b. and real growth to increase.
c. to increase and real growth to remain unchanged.
d. to increase and real growth to decrease.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine How to Properly Take a Blood Sugar Test?...
- H Health and Medicine Simple and Effective: How to Get Rid of Cracked Heels...
- L Leisure and Entertainment What to Bring on a Hike? Essential Items to Pack for a Safe and Enjoyable Adventure...
- L Leisure and Entertainment Couchsurfing: A New Way to Travel...
- S Style and Beauty Autotanning: Harmful or Safe?...
- F Food and Cooking 10 Ideas for a Wedding Anniversary Gift...
- H Health and Medicine How to Reduce Sweating in the Heat and Beyond: Say Goodbye to Excessive Sweat...
- F Food and Cooking Do Aphrodisiacs Really Work? Separating Fact from Fiction...
- H Health and Medicine What to Eat to Lose Weight?...
- A Animals and plants How to Teach Your Parrot to Talk?...
Answers on questions: Business
- S SAT Connotative meaning of flatten the curve....
- H History Which of the following topics is too broad for a 10-minute speech? how to shoot a free throw the best college basketball team this year my favorite basketball player...
- C Computers and Technology Given the following code: if (n==2) { k-= 2; } else if (n==3) { k-=3; } can be rewritten as if () {; } where condition and assignment statement are chosen so that...
- M Mathematics Find the Perimeter of the figure below, composed of an isoceles trapezoid and one semicircle. Rounded to the nearest tenths place...
Ответ:
See explanation
Explanation:
a. What is the amount of tax penalty that Eggers is risking by taking this position?
The amount of tax penalty that Eggers is risking by taking this position will be:
= $400,000 × 20%
= $400,000 × 20/100
= $400,000 × 0.2
= $80,000
The 20% used is the penalty charged when a claim is more than the final amount that's being allowed by the court or the IRS.
b.What would be the result if there was a 45% chance that Eggers’ interpretation of the Regulation was correct?
The result in this case if there was a 45% chance that Eggers’ interpretation of the Regulation was correct will be that Eggers will have zero tax penalty given. This is because since a reasonable cause was shown by the corporation, the penalty will be waived.