![angelica7773](/avatars/38203.jpg)
angelica7773
02.08.2021 •
Business
LPT Inc. is an integrated oil company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The company has three operating divisions: oil exploration and production (commonly referred to as E&P), pipelines, and refining. Historically, LPT did not spend a great deal of time thinking about the opportunity costs of capital for each of its divisions and used a company-wide weighted average cost of capital of 14 percent for all new capital investment projects. Recent changes in its businesses have made it abundantly clear to LPT's management that this is not a reasonable approach. For example, investors demand a much higher expected rate of return for exploration and production ventures than for pipeline investments. Although LPT's management agrees, in principle at least, that different operating divisions should face an opportunity cost of capital that reflects their individual risk characteristics, they are not in agreement about whether a move toward divisional costs of capital is a good idea based on practical considerations.
Required:
a. Pete Jennings is the chief operating officer for the E&P division, and he is concerned that going to a system of divisional costs of capital may restrain his ability to undertake very promising exploration opportunities. He argues that the firm really should be concerned about finding those opportunities that offer the highest possible rate of return on invested capital. Pete contends that using the firm's scarce capital to take on the most promising projects would lead to the greatest increase in shareholder value. Do you agree with Pete? Why or why not?
b. The pipeline division manager, Donna Selma, has long argued that charging her division the company-wide cost of capital of 14 percent severely penalizes her opportunities to increase shareholder value. Do you agree with Donna? Explain.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- C Cities and Countries What time does the Metro open in Moscow?...
- T Travel and tourism How to Use a Compass: A Beginner s Guide...
- C Computers and Internet Porn Banner: What It Is and How to Get Rid Of It?...
- F Food and Cooking How many stages of coffee roasting are there?...
- F Food and Cooking From Latte to Espresso: Which Coffee Drink is the Most Popular on Earth?...
- F Food and Cooking Experts Name Top 5 Healthiest Teas...
- C Computers and Internet Google Search Tips and Tricks: Everything You Need to Know...
- H Health and Medicine Discover the Hidden Principles and Real Results of the Japanese Diet...
- H Health and Medicine Liver Cleansing - Rejuvenation for the Body?...
- S Style and Beauty Is Photoepilation the Solution to Unwanted Hair Forever?...
Ответ:
Corrective taxes are levied on per unit basis, it could be dollars per ton of pollution, so those who can reduce pollution at a lower cost than taxes would reduce pollution and don't pay taxes. Those firms who can't reduce pollution at lower cost than the tax will pay taxes and pollute the environment. It effectively puts a price over rights of pollution.
Tradable pollution permits are efficient because those forms who can reduce pollution at lower cost will do that and trade those rights to the firms who can't reduce at lower cost. They would do this trade for a price they mutually agree to. In this way both the firms are better off and leads to socially efficient outcomes.
Explanation: