Having read the PRO and CON article, write a brief response to explain which of the two articles makes a weaker argument. Give two or three examples of the kinds of details the author would need to provide in his/ her article to strengthen the current argument.Having read the PRO and CON article, write a brief response to explain which of the two articles makes a weaker argument. Give two or three examples of the kinds of details the author would need to provide in his/ her article to strengthen the current argument.

Proponents of this idea state that it will save local cities and towns money because libraries are expensive to maintain. They also believe it will encourage more people to read because they won’t have to travel to a library to get a book; they can simply click on what they want to read and read it from wherever they are. They could also access more materials because libraries won’t have to buy physical copies of books; they can simply rent out as many digital copies as they need.

Explanation:

However, it would be a serious mistake to replace libraries with tablets. First, digital books and resources are associated with less learning and more problems than print resources. A study done on tablet vs book reading found that people read 20-30% slower on tablets, retain 20% less information, and understand 10% less of what they read compared to people who read the same information in print. Additionally, staring too long at a screen has been shown to cause numerous health problems, including blurred vision, dizziness, dry eyes, headaches, and eye strain, at much higher instances than reading print does. People who use tablets and mobile devices excessively also have a higher incidence of more serious health issues such as fibromyalgia, shoulder and back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, and muscle strain. I know that whenever I read from my e-reader for too long, my eyes begin to feel tired and my neck hurts. We should not add to these problems by giving people, especially young people, more reasons to look at screens.

I believe the answer is A) diction and syntax, because diction is the choice of words, and of course the setting depends on the words used, if very old words are used, then it is likely to assume that the setting is in the older era, whereas if modern language is used, of course, the setting is in the modern times.