How is this claim arguable?

i much prefer reading on a tablet or a computer than reading from a book.

explain also why it's arguable .

if it is a claim thats not arguable then will u make it arguable for me? alter it enough to make it arguable for me .

This claim can be very arguable because many people say that tablets discharge very quickly and that it can affective for your eye sight. However,  You can download books in your tablet  pretty much when ever you want. In the other side people that think books are better to read, and say other reasons why books are better.

Explanation:

It is arguable because some people prefer reading from electronic devices rather than from their books.

Explanation:

The correct answer is: Although Enkidu fears for his own life, he is thoughtless and does not necessarily fear for the lives of others.

Explanation:

In this illustration, Enkidu is represented as a selfish person, who is frightened of Humbaba and fears for his own life, without caring for the lives of others. Because of that, he says Gilgamesh he should go into the forest and kill Humbaba, just to make sure he will stay out of the forest and save his own life.

He doesn't think about Gilgamesh as a hero, although he knows Gilgamesh is a courageous leader, he doesn't think about Gilgamesh's win or success. Enkidu thinks Gilgamesh should fight against Humbaba alone and showing his selfishness by deciding to stay out of the wood, in order to save his life.