In "a culinary wasteland," what opinion does the author hold of fast food nation?

a. she loved it and thinks it encourages people to eat more fast food.
b. she was disgusted by it and vowed never to eat at a fast-food restaurant again.
c. she dislikes it and believes it lacks logical support for its central argument.
d. she enjoyed it and feels that it explains the problems with fast food well.

C.She dislikes it and believes it lacks logical support for its central argument.

Explanation:

Throughout her book, she points all sorts of problems with fast food. A lot of it is about the lack of logic in spending money to eat something that is not even that good and it's certainly unhealthy. Cynthia Crossen shows several different aspects on regards the quality of the food and the negative effect it has on people.

We are reminded of how companies make advertisements directly to children by putting toys in happy meals and also having so on. Fast Food Nation explains how this sort of food has impacted the diet of Americans, from the way they process the food all the way to how they export it. In the book, the world of fast food is mentioned as evil.

The Bill of Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are two vital documents dedicated to the safety, security, and overall well-being of two very different groups of people. The Bill of Rights was simply the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was made for all of the people governed by the separate and independent nations included in the United Nations. The key difference in the documents rests not in the words, but in the audiences to which they speak to and of. Comparing the one complete declaration of laws, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and part of another, Bill of Rights as part of the US Constitution, is very different from a comparison of both documents as a whole. I will look specifically to the Articles presented in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and not the Preamble to compare and contrast with the Bill of Rights.