mommytobe2019
mommytobe2019
28.09.2020 • 
English

Interpretation 1 - President Jackson should have respected the decision of the Supreme Court and not forced the Cherokee Indian tribes to move.
Interpretation 2 - President Jackson was within his rights to ignore the
Supreme Court decision if it conflicted with his promise to provide land to
American citizens.
Which statement best compares the two interpretations of President Andrew
Jackson's decision?
A. Interpretation 1 opposes President Jackson's decision, while
interpretation 2 supports it.
B. Interpretation 1 supports President Jackson's decision, while
interpretation 2 opposes it.
C. Both interpretations support President Jackson's decision to
ignore the Court's ruling.
D. Both interpretations agree that President Jackson should have
respected the Court's decision.
Lo


Interpretation 1 - President Jackson should have respected the decision of

the Supreme Court and

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question