Please help
How can Sharil best adjust her argument based on this new
information, while still keeping her claim the same?
Sharil wrote an argument in favor of starting a rock-climbing
club at her school as a fun and safe activity. She then came
across a source claiming that rock climbers have an
increased risk of developing wrist and ankle injuries because
rock climbing places pressure on the joints, which can
cause sprains.

by going back through her original essay and removing
every direct reference to rock climbing or rock walls

by not referring to this new information in her argument
and instead focusing on what she has already learned

by arguing that the increased risk of wrist and ankle
injuries should be ignored since it is not a serious problem

by recognizing the risks but arguing that students can
avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right
equipment
Please help

D. By recognizing the risk but arguing that students can avoid injuries if they are careful and use the right equipment.

Explanation:

The expression consists of 2 terms and each terms contains 3 factors.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression (abc)+(def), the description of the expression is as shown:

The expression consists of 2 terms and each terms contains 2 factors.

Terms are expressions connected by mathematical signs such as addition and subtraction sign. As we can see from (abc)+(def), 'abc' and 'def' are separated by addition signs therefore both abc and def are the "terms" of the expression.

Factors are variables connected using the multiplication or bracket signs. As we can see, each term contains 3 factors. Looking at the first term 'abc', we can see that there are 3 variables/factors (a, b and c) multiplied together. This shows that they are connected by multiplication signs and same goes with 'def'.

Hence, the expression consists of 2 terms and each terms contains 3 factors.