jj11vb
jj11vb
26.07.2019 • 
English

Read the following excerpt from stalin's speech: it may be asked: how could the soviet government have consented to conclude a non-aggression pact with such treacherous fiends as hitler and ribbentrop? was not this an error on the part of the soviet government? of course not! non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two states. it was such a pact that germany proposed to us in 1939. could the soviet government have declined such a proposal? i think that not a single peace-loving state could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring state even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as hitler and ribbentrop. which logical fallacy can be found in this excerpt? a. circular reasoning b. straw man argument c. red herring d. bandwagon argument
2b2t

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question