![slavenkaitlynn](/avatars/1644.jpg)
slavenkaitlynn
29.11.2021 •
English
We will not speak of the innumerable instances in which wasteful and idle men live upon the earnings of industrious wives. Nor shall we speak of situations in which wives leave their husbands, and take with them the children, to perform the double duty of mother and father. And after doing so, they are then followed from place to place, and threatened to be robbed of their children. These wives are accused of depriving the so-called rights of a husband. The husbands, claiming their rights, plant themselves in their poor lodgings, frighten them into paying tribute by taking from them the children, and run these overtasked women into debt. Such instances add up by scores within my own memory. I have seen the husband who had stained himself by a long course of low vice, till his wife was wearied from her heroic forgiveness. His treachery made any effort to forgive him useless. To be able to provide bread for herself and her children, she had to be separate from his ill fame. I have known this kind of man to install himself in the chamber of a woman who loathed him and say she should never take food without his company. I have known these kinds of men to steal their children, whom they knew they had no means to maintain, take them into corrupt company, and to expose them to bodily danger, just to assert their power over their wives. And these women, who alone have borne the pangs of birth, and nourished their infancy, are denied equal rights to parent and protect them. I do believe that this mode of kidnapping—and it is frequent enough in all classes of society—will be by the next age viewed as it is by Heaven now. I believe that the man who avails himself of the shelter of men's laws to steal from a mother her own children, or claim any superior right in them, save that of superior virtue, will bear the stigma he deserves. Just like the man who steals grown men from their motherland, their hopes, and their homes.
What does paragraph 1 suggest about Fuller?
She is scornful of women who repeatedly excuse their husbands’ immoral and criminal behavior.
She feels men abuse their power to control those without rights, such as women and enslaved persons.
Fuller is against the institution of marriage because it does not benefit women.
Fuller demands severe consequences for men who cannot financially support their families.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Windows Genuine Check?...
- C Computers and Internet War of Social Media: Which Platform is the Leader?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Treat the Flu: A Comprehensive Guide...
- O Other What is a Disk Emulsifier and How Does it Work?...
- F Family and Home What does a newborn need?...
- F Family and Home Choosing the Right Car Seat for Your Child: Tips and Recommendations...
- F Food and Cooking How to Get Reconfirmation of Registration?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Spam in ICQ?...
- A Art and Culture Who Said The Less We Love a Woman, the More She Likes Us ?...
- F Family and Home How to Get Rid of Your Neighbors?...
Ответ:
Mary who is in the mountains now, is our chess champion. The robber stole the car that was left in front of the supermarket. That's the boy who has just arrived at the airport. I liked very much the book which she gave me for my birthday. Chisinau, which is the capital of our country, is becoming more and more beautiful.
Explanation: The most common are which, that, whose, whoever, whomever, who, and whom. In some situations, the words what, when, and where can also function as relative pronouns. Hope this helps