What is the main benefit of letting the narrator describe a human's inability to stop nature?
a. it creates an unrealistic sense of the powerful nature of the narrator.
b. it creates tension in that all events are seen against coming failure and grief.
c. it suggests the events are more or less within the narrator's control.
d. it suggests the narrator is growing more and more .

b. It creates tension in that all events are seen against coming failure and grief.

Explanation:

Nowadays, science has become powerful in the world. That's why It can be a bit shocking the possible idea of "human's inability to stop nature"  shown in a story by a narrator. However, the main benefit of letting the narrator describe a human's inability to stop nature is that It creates tension in that all events are seen against coming failure and grief.

ExplaIt depends who's replying. In the event that you solicit a part from the South African government, he will let you know  that it is discrete and parallel improvement of white and black.

All things considered, he may give you any of twelve answers emerging out of whatever part of politically-sanctioned racial segregation he has been raised short against that day, for to him it is neither an ideological idea nor a strategy, however a setting in  which his entire life, getting the hang of, working, adoring is inflexibly encased. He could give you a rundown of the laws that  confine him from seeking to the greater part of the points of any humanized individual, or getting a charge out of the delights that everybody  else underestimates. However, it is impossible that he will.  

What might be at the forefront of his thoughts right now is the issue of how to spare his splendid kid from the  watered down 'Bantu Education' which is presently being substituted for standard instruction in schools for dark  kids. Or on the other hand maybe you've just gotten him on the morning after he's gone through a night in the police cells  since he was out after time limitation hours without a bit of paper bearing a white man's mark allowing  him to do as such. Maybe (if he's a man who thinks about such things) he's inclination angry in light of the fact that there's a  show around the local area he'd not be allowing to visit, or (if he's the sort of man who isn't) he's angered at having to  pay a bootleg market cost for a jug of liquor he's suspended from purchasing really. That is politically-sanctioned racial segregation, to him.

explanation:

plz give brianliest