What is the most likely reason that Kashyap included story of Roja R.? How does this example affect her argument?

This question is about "Clothing Brands Need to Step Up and Keep Women Safe in Their Factories"

Kashyap included Roja R's story to show evidence of how many places have supported fair working conditions for women. This example, makes Kashyap's argument gain veracity and validation, since it addresses a real issue.

Explanation:

Kashyap's article shows a situation that is unfortunately very common in our modern world. This is because women's rights and protection in the industrial sector is still underestimated and disrespected in the industrial sector.

To reinforce this argument, the author uses the real case of women working in a clothing factory in India. This is the case with Roja R who is constantly harassed by his superiors, but can do nothing against it, for fear of losing his job. Roja, even reported the case to the company's board of directors who said that this is a normal situation and that it does no harm to anyone. She should adapt or leave the company.

An example for that question is: Who among the population would be satisfied with the global handicap?

Surely, the government admnistrators would feel most accomplished and relieved living in a world where nobody holds the wits, brawn, or beauty to challenge their positions. After all, in any society, someone must stand out above all the others to be a successful ruler. But regarding the populace, would it be possible for anyone to feel satisfied with this imposed lifestyle? Or would it be considered too "ingenious" to feel otherwise?

For some, this could be an utopia; For the to-be handicapped, it is opression.