![micahsocool23](/avatars/1415.jpg)
micahsocool23
21.04.2020 •
English
What techniques can a speaker use to persuade an audience? Check all that apply
appealing to an audience's emotions
explaining data and statistics
sharing a personal experience
giving proof of his or her credibility
telling a relevant story
Intro
Done
E
Am
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine Naskol ko Opasen Ukus Kleshcha i Kak Ego Raspoznat...
- H Health and Medicine 10 Ways to Cleanse Your Colon and Improve Your Health...
- D Dating, Love, Relationships How to Overcome Jealousy: Tips and Tricks...
- H Health and Medicine Angina: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
- F Food and Cooking Delight for Gourmets: How to Prepare Liver Pate...
- S Style and Beauty How to braid friendship bracelets?...
- H Health and Medicine Mercury Thermometer Danger: What to do when a thermometer breaks?...
- F Food and Cooking Which Calamari Salad is the Most Delicious?...
- S Society and Politics 10 Tips for Boosting Your Self-Esteem...
Answers on questions: English
- E English Question 8 of 10 What is the consequence for Frankenstein when he values knowledge over morals? A. He can never return to his family. B. He is deprived of marrying...
- S Social Studies Three-year-old aspen said to her mother, me goed to the park. is you goed too? she is displaying errors in...
- B Biology Pls help 30 points Hydrogen bonding cause and effect Expands upon freezing cause and effect Dissolves many substances cause and effect Cohesion cause and effect...
- M Mathematics PLS HELP THIS IS DUE TMR WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST...
Ответ:
There was widespread concern in the 1860s and 1870s with ‘plutocracy’ – the political and social power of commercial wealth. It argues that we should not interpret either the pressure for parliamentary reform in the 1860s, or the consequences of the 1867 act, simply in terms of a contest between aristocracy and democracy. A third element, the growing influence of commercial men, was very widely noted before and after 1867, with differences of opinion about whether this would more favour the aristocracy or the democracy. Anxiety about plutocracy fuelled much of the pressure for reform, from both Cobdenite radicals and academic Liberals; this last group in particular was preoccupied with the possible parliamentary dominance of unimaginative and materialistic money men. On the other hand, opponents of reform were sceptical that a new electoral settlement would halt the rising influence of money. They were proved right, not least because the 1867 reforms increased the cost of winning a seat. The three parliaments elected in 1868, 1874, and 1880 were dominated by commercial men, and there was even more alarm about plutocracy than before 1867. While this was interpreted in different ways by different groups, on the whole it benefited the Conservative Party and Conservative argument significantly more than it helped the Liberals. The Liberal Party found it difficult to agree on whether the political influence of commercial elites – a group with which it had once been identified – was now excessive, and what, if anything, could be done about it. This was to become a major problem for the left.