Do you agree with Professor Diamond's thesis that Paleolithic hunter-gatherers may have been better off than their neolithic farming cousins? Explain your position.

Yes, professor Diamond is right in many senses.

Explanation:

For example, hunter-gatherers had healthier diets and healthier bodies than neolithic farmers. The hunter-gatherer diet was based on a great variety of fruits, vegetables, meats, while the neolithic farmer diet was based on a few staples like wheat or barley.

And while the hunter-gatherer move around constantly in search for food, and a had a fit physique, the neolithic farmer often did very hard work on the farm, that was also hard on the body.

Hunter-gatherer society was also more egalitarian, social hierarchies were soft or even non-existant in some tribes. Neolithic society became stratified, and a few people at the top began to take possession of the food surpluses that farming produced.

These coordinates are what the Global Position System or GPS uses to provide an accurate locational relay. Longitude and latitude lines measure the distance from the Earth's Equator or central axis - running east to west - and the Prime Meridian in Greenwich, England - running north to south.

I hope this is what you are looking for... If not I am sorry for not providing the correct/accurate answer. (^-^)