Does the Court's decision make it impossible to treat juvenile and adult cases
differently?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- P Photography and Videography How to Choose the Perfect Photo Paper for Your Images?...
- H Health and Medicine What vaccines do children need?...
- H Health and Medicine Reasons for the Appearance of Warts: Everything You Need to Know...
- A Art and Culture How to Learn Screaming: Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners...
- H Health and Medicine Contraceptive Pills After 35: The Importance Of Choosing The Right Medication...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Where Did Tarot Cards Come From?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Make Your Lips Fuller? Ideas and Tips for Beautiful Lips...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Why are the factors of production important to economics A they are not important and...
- H History The radius of a sphere is 6 units.Which expression represents the volume of the sphere, incubic units?627(6)03 ()3-011217(12)...
- H History To what extent was the availability of credit the main cause of the “boom” of the 1920s? Explain why?...
- H History What are signs of corruption in New York and Chicago...
- H History When the Supreme Curt uses judicial review to strike down a law written by Congress, then that is an example of ______....
- H History Hilter supported franco and the fascists in which battle in 1937?...
- H History Arab countries cut off shipments of oil to the united states because the u.s. supported israel during an arab-israeli war. the crisis that followed resulted in the...
- H History What compromises did congress pass in order to lessen sectional conflicts in the early 19th century?...
- H History Based on the locations that you mapped in part a of this question, why do you think egypt and south africa were important colonies for britain during the scramble...
- H History How did napoleon build and defend his empire?...
Ответ:
Explanation:
The Juvenile Justice System
A separate juvenile justice system was established in the United States about 100 years ago with the goal of diverting youthful offenders from the destructive punishments of criminal courts and encouraging rehabilitation based on the individual juvenile's needs. This system was to differ from adult or criminal court in a number of ways. It was to focus on the child or adolescent as a person in need of assistance, not on the act that brought him or her before the court. The proceedings were informal, with much discretion left to the juvenile court judge. Because the judge was to act in the best interests of the child, procedural safeguards available to adults, such as the right to an attorney, the right to know the charges brought against one, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one's accuser, were thought unnecessary. Juvenile court proceedings were closed to the public and juvenile records were to remain confidential so as not to interfere with the child's or adolescent's ability to be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. The very language used in juvenile court underscored these differences. Juveniles are not charged with crimes, but rather with delinquencies; they are not found guilty, but rather are adjudicated delinquent; they are not sent to prison, but to training school or reformatory.
In practice, there was always a tension between social welfare and social control—that is, focusing on the best interests of the individual child versus focusing on punishment, incapacitation, and protecting society from certain offenses. This tension has shifted over time and has varied significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and it remains today.
Page 155
Suggested Citation:"The Juvenile Justice System." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2001. Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9747.×
Add a note to your bookmark
In response to the increase in violent crime in the 1980s, state legal reforms in juvenile justice, particularly those that deal with serious offenses, have stressed punitiveness, accountability, and a concern for public safety, rejecting traditional concerns for diversion and rehabilitation in favor of a get-tough approach to juvenile crime and punishment. This change in emphasis from a focus on rehabilitating the individual to punishing the act is exemplified by the 17 states that redefined the purpose clause of their juvenile courts to emphasize public safety, certainty of sanctions, and offender accountability (Torbet and Szymanski, 1998). Inherent in this change in focus is the belief that the juvenile justice system is too soft on delinquents, who are thought to be potentially as much a threat to public safety as their adult criminal counterparts.
It is important to remember that the United States has at least 51 different juvenile justice systems, not one. Each state and the District of Columbia has its own laws that govern its juvenile justice system. How juvenile courts operate may vary from county to county and municipality to municipality within a state. The federal government has jurisdiction over a small number of juveniles, such as those who commit crimes on Indian reservations or in national parks, and it has its own laws to govern juveniles within its system. States that receive money under the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act must meet certain requirements, such as not housing juveniles with adults in detention or incarceration facilities, but it is state law that governs the structure of juvenile courts and juvenile corrections facilities. When this report refers to the juvenile justice system, it is referring to a generic framework that is more or less representative of what happens in any given state.
Ответ:
Frame narratives, as exemplified by Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, were popularly used in nineteenth-century English literature to introduce multiple characters and perspectives.
Explanation:
hope this helps