![angelolucero146](/avatars/34465.jpg)
angelolucero146
06.03.2021 •
History
Each church or religious group follows one of these that may be more or less specific to it's members?
1.creed
2.creditors
3.credentials
4.accrediation
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Science and Technology Colliders: How They Work and Why They Matter...
- C Construction and repair How to Choose the Best Underfloor Heating?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Windows Genuine Check?...
- C Computers and Internet War of Social Media: Which Platform is the Leader?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Treat the Flu: A Comprehensive Guide...
- O Other What is a Disk Emulsifier and How Does it Work?...
- F Family and Home What does a newborn need?...
- F Family and Home Choosing the Right Car Seat for Your Child: Tips and Recommendations...
- F Food and Cooking How to Get Reconfirmation of Registration?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Spam in ICQ?...
Ответ:
1. Creed.
Explanation:
A creed is also known as confession of faith and it can be defined as an authoritative formula or statement of religious belief which summarizes the core tenets of a particular religion.
Simply stated, a creed is a symbol or confession of faith for a particular religion.
Each church or religious group follows a creed which may be more or less specific to it's members.
In Christianity, some examples of a creed are "Jesus is Lord" and “I believe in the holy catholic church.”
Additionally, in order for an excommunicated member to be reinstated as a bonafide member of the church, the individual must show a sign of repentance, renewal of obedience, or a profession of the creed in a catholic church.
Ответ:
There are members of the National Association [Nationalverein] – of this association that has
achieved a reputation owing to the justness of its demands – highly esteemed members who have stated
that all standing armies are superfluous. Yes, if only a public assembly had this view! Would not a
government have to reject this?! – There was talk about the “sobriety” of the Prussian people. Yes, the
great independence of the individual makes it difficult in Prussia to govern with the constitution (or to
consolidate the constitution?); in France things are different, there this individual independence is
lacking. A constitutional crisis would not be disgraceful, but honorable instead. – Furthermore, we are
perhaps too “well-educated” to support a constitution; we are too critical; the ability to assess
government measures and records of the public assembly is too common; in the country there are a lot
of catiline [conspiratorial] characters who have a great interest in upheavals. This may sound
paradoxical, but everything proves how hard constitutional life is in Prussia. – Furthermore, one is too
sensitive about the government’s mistakes; as if it were enough to say “this and that [cabinet] minister
made mistakes, as if one wasn’t adversely affected oneself. Public opinion changes, the press is not [the
same as] public opinion; one knows how the press is written; members of parliament have a higher
duty, to lead opinion, to stand above it. We are too hot-blooded, we have a preference for putting on
armor that is too big for our small body; and now we’re actually supposed to utilize it. Germany is not
looking to Prussia’s liberalism, but to its power; Bavaria, Württemberg, Baden may indulge liberalism,
and for that reason no one will assign them Prussia’s role; Prussia has to coalesce and concentrate its
power for the opportune moment, which has already been missed several times; Prussia’s borders
Explanation:
BRAINLEIST