Explain how the wilmot proviso was so controversial in raising the debate over the slave issue again to such intense levels.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine What vaccines do children need?...
- H Health and Medicine Reasons for the Appearance of Warts: Everything You Need to Know...
- G Goods and services What Are the Most Popular Services?...
- O Other What is the oldest joke ever told?...
- L Legal consultation How to Properly Inherit: Tips and Recommendations...
- C Computers and Internet Boost your processor performance with these easy tips...
- S Sport How does Bodyflex work: what is it and how does it work?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Whiten Teeth and Get the Perfect Smile...
- S Style and Beauty How to Properly Apply Eye Makeup: Tips from a Professional Makeup Artist...
- A Auto and Moto How Can Parking Sensors Help Drivers?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History If bed bugs stay on your bed- then cockroches-...
- H History The initial impact of new people moving into the housing developments surrounding Lake Forest will be: *...
- H History Qué es argamasa y para qué se utiliza para la...
- H History I NEED HELP ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS PLEASEEE!!?!?...
- H History 1. Grabe! Nahilo ako sa sobrang dami ng taong dumating atdumadagsa upang panoorin ang kakaibang pagtatanghal.a. pagkainisc. pagkagalitb. nasaktand. pagkatakotlos...
- H History The main reason for the passage of the National Security Act was to separate the armed forces into different departments. enable the nation to meet the challenges...
- H History What are three ways the colonies tried to pay for the american revolution....
- H History Why did people hoard goods and materials during the American revolution?...
- H History ANSWER FASTWhat was the contract of america and how did president Clinton respond to it?...
- H History 30 Points what is the political message of The Rail Splitter cartoon? What bias exists in the cartoon? How has the cartoon affected political communication?...
Ответ:
The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.
Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)
Ответ:
D
Explanation:
tictonic plate yun ang nagpapaliwanag sa paggalaw ng kalupaan