How did health care in north carolina change during the progressive era? doctors began making house calls to poor neighborhoods. medical training advanced and hospital quality improved. government cutbacks led to a decline in public-health monitoring. most hospitals were shut down after running out of money.

Health care in North Carolina changed during the Progressive Era by giving advanced medical training and hospital quality improved  

Explanation:

North Carolina was the highly populated and during the progressive era reports stated that many young individuals were not willing to join in the army due to various health concerns. It was supervised and an immediate federal measure called Pie commission was formed. It worked for the medical benefits received by the customers.

It aimed at establishing quality oriented hospitals and many trained physicians and nurses were appointed. At schools, medical examination was compulsory and many doctors who were trained received scholarship if they agreed to work in remote rural undeserved areas for the health and welfare of the community.  

Soon, Pie commission understood that the funds that were appropriated were not adequate and hence larger federal funds were invested in health departments. Much health insurance coverage was provided to the citizens in North Carolina.

Segregation did not restrict from the medical services to render benefits and many African Americans yielded many benefits out of it. Emergence of North Carolina institute of medicine aimed at graduating many trained doctors who worked relentlessly for the health development of its citizens.

Goldman was in favor of the union, while Frick was against.

Explanation:

The Homestead strike was one of the biggest labor conflicts in US history and represented a battle against the top trade union representing technical professionals in the iron and steel industry and major steel companies.

In the face of the events of the strike Goldman was extremely in favor of the claims of the unions, stating that the working class, as an essential member of the means of production, should have their claims met, so that the work could be continued.

Frick, on the other hand, was strongly against the union and claimed that the working class was a weak minority and that minorities are the ones who should be bowing to the majorities and not the other way around.

Goldman's claims are presented in a more credible way, since without the working class the means of production cannot act, being therefore the most important class within the production systems and must be the most privileged class.