![smagallanes](/avatars/48470.jpg)
smagallanes
20.01.2021 •
History
How did South Carolina & Texas react to the
Election of Abraham Lincoln?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine These Food Additives Can Do Significant Harm to Your Health...
- F Food and Cooking How to Get Reconfirmation of Registration?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Spam in ICQ?...
- A Art and Culture Who Said The Less We Love a Woman, the More She Likes Us ?...
- F Family and Home How to Get Rid of Your Neighbors?...
- S Society and Politics How Could Nobody Know About the Dead Mountaineers?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Cure Adenoids?...
- H Health and Medicine Why Wearing a Back Brace Can Be Beneficial During Back Strain?...
- S Sport When and Where Will the 2014 World Cup be Held?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
Ответ:
The South was very displeased with the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States in 1860. They were convinced Lincoln was going to end slavery. The South came to this conclusion for a few reasons. In the Lincoln-Douglas debates for the United States Senate in 1858 in Illinois, Lincoln made it clear he thought slavery was wrong. He also believed that slavery shouldn’t spread. When he got the nomination from the anti-slavery Republican Party in 1860, the South was very concerned.
The South had made up its mind. They believed Lincoln would end slavery. However, if they would have listened closely to Lincoln, he had said if he could keep the country together by keeping slavery, he would do so. While Lincoln would clearly try to slavery from spreading, he knew keeping the country together was his number one objective. If that meant keeping slavery where it already existed, Lincoln was prepared to do this. However, the South wouldn’t accept this option. At first, seven southern states seceded from the Union. Eventually, four more states joined them in what was known as the Confederate states of America.
Explanation: cause why the f would i write that much
Ответ:
Structural Changes
Explanation:
According to Roberta Lexier, civil disobedience is usually described as "a public, non-violent and conscientious violation of law committed with a view to bringing about change in laws or government policies. "1 As Lexier says, the aims of civil disobedience are" to publicize an unjust law or a just cause.