How did the Catholic Church get involved in restraining knights from attacking vulnerable people?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine Why Wearing a Back Brace Can Be Beneficial During Back Strain?...
- S Sport When and Where Will the 2014 World Cup be Held?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Get Rid of Peeling Nails: Natural Remedies...
- S Science and Technology Understanding Magnetic Storms: A Guide to This Natural Phenomenon...
- F Family and Home What is Most Important in Men s Lives?...
- G Goods and services Which TV is better - LCD or Plasma?...
- C Computers and Internet Are there special gaming mice?...
- G Goods and services LED-подсветка в LCD-телевизорах: 5 причин, почему она лучше других технологий...
- C Computers and Internet Keep Your Mouse Pad Clean: The Right Way to Clean It?...
Answers on questions: History
- M Mathematics Evaluate lim x=π/4(3x - tanx)...
- E English How is the setting of the excerpt similar to the setting of Ovid’s Pyramus and Thisbe ?Which line(s) from Ovid’s Pyramus and Thisbe reveal a plot detail?...
- C Chemistry An object that has a height of 0.4 meter is placed at a distance of 0.7 meter from a concave spherical mirror. an image is formed in front of the mirror and has a height...
- S Social Studies some tags include that specify additional information about the content to be formatted by the tag....
Ответ:
Intimidation
Explanation:
The Catholic Church gets involved in restraining knights from attacking vulnerable people through INTIMIDATION of Knights.
This is done in such a way that the Catholic Church was intimidating the knights with the clothes, blood, and bones of the saints, declaring that if the knights did not obey or follow the command and word of God and stop attacking the vulnerable people, the saints would punish them.
Ответ:
This three thinkers, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle agreed that the State was absolute and should be completely obeyed, but differed on their ideas of what or who the State is.
Socrates held the view that the State should always be obeyed, even if it made decisions that the individual may disagree with. He believed that if you choose to live under a sovereign power, for the benefits that this bring to the individual, them the individual must also submit completely to the law of the State, for the benefit of society.
Plato also believed that the State should be completely obeyed, but in his society people would naturally assumed their roles based upon what kind of person they are, something decided by which part of their sole is most prominent; for him the soul was divided in three parts: reason, spirit, desire. He believed that knowledge of "the Forms" constituted legitimacy, and also that philosophers should govern society as philosopher kings.
Aristotle rejected Plato's totalitarian ideas and argued that Plato's vision of the State removed any sense of individuality, which is the key to human prosperity. He explained that humans are a "political" animal that need to be surrounded by other humans, with individual thoughts, in order to argue and debate. Although he did still believed that there are natural rulers and natural slaves, his idea was more individualistic and based on what people are good at.