How would the world be different if tanks had never emerged ?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- A Auto and Moto How Can Parking Sensors Help Drivers?...
- H Health and Medicine What is the Normal Blood Sugar Level in a Healthy Person?...
- D Dating, Love, Relationships How Long Can Love Last?...
- A Auto and Moto Mastering One-Movement Parking: All You Need to Know...
- C Computers and Internet How to Properly Order Clothing from International Online Stores...
- H Health and Medicine Headache: A Comprehensive Guide to Treatment...
- F Family and Home How to Choose the Best Diapers for Your Baby?...
- A Auto and Moto Discovering the Leader: What is the Most Expensive Car in the World?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Quickly Put your Child to Sleep?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Create a Website for Free and Easy?...
Answers on questions: History
- E English I NEED HELP FAST In the poem Harriet Tubman aka Moses,” which character trait does Tubman display when a member of her group cannot keep going? confusion compassion steadfastness...
- E English Which is not true about modernist writing? question options: used experimental techniques highlighted the alienation of the individual in the modern world captured the...
- M Mathematics Sinplify this expression -3(10x+4y)+6(6x-2y)...
- E English How do the structures of the secret life of walter mitty and to build a fire differ? a. the secret life of walter mitty tells the story in chronological order, but to...
Ответ:
If tanks had not emerged, there might not have been so many causalities in wars and countries fighting would have maintained a good count of soldiers.
Explanation:
Tanks were first made use of in the First World War. The tanks could easily cross muddy battlefields and fire lethal weapons. This meant that several soldiers of an army died at any given time when a tank was used. Had tanks not been discovered, there would have been more peace in the world and the armies would not always be under constant fear of war.
Ответ:
Several sources of conflict arose between the British colonists and the Tuscarora. While it would seem that land was plentiful, the Native Americans built their villages on riverbank locations sought by colonists who looked for fertile soil and access to water transportation. The European settlers often cheated the Native Americans in trade and sometimes stole from them or killed them to obtain goods; the increasingly brisk trade in slaves further depleted the Indian populations. Other problems arose from the intrusion of a culture that clearly defined land ownership upon another whose notions of ownership were much more subjective. To the Tuscarora, land and the animals that roamed it were not personal property, but natural resources available to anyone in need. Yet, what they personally grew belonged to the grower, and they respected that ownership. But the colonists rarely understood when a Tuscarora raiding party took their livestock, or when they set fire to the land before their annual hunts in a ceremony that often destroyed timber and farmland claimed by settlers.
At first, both sides tried to avoid armed conflict. The colonial government signed treaties with the Tuscarora designed to protect their land and to ease trade relations, but the settlers often ignored or blatantly dishonored these agreements. In 1710, the Tuscarora attempted to emigrate to Pennsylvania but were denied permission by the Pennsylvania government because the colony's law forbidding the importation of Indian slaves was written in such broad terms that it forbade Indian immigration as well. The Tuscarora sought but never received from North Carolina's colonial Government a guarantee of their good behavior, a document that may have allowed them entrance into Pennsylvania. In the end, the Tuscarora were forced to remain on the frontiers of encroaching European settlement and to accept into their midst an increasing number of Native American refugees forced from their land. Warfare became inevitable.
Shortly after the death of John Lawson in 1711, the Tuscarora chief Hancock organized a force of 500 warriors to drive out the colonists. On the morning of 23 September 1711, small raiding parties began assaulting plantations near Bath. The colonists, who had not anticipated bloodshed, were low on supplies and ammunition. Moreover, they were left with no time to retaliate: a small band of Tuscarora would approach each isolated plantation in their everyday manner, then attack without warning. They slew both men and women, children and adults, and often mutilated the bodies of their victims. Three days of carnage claimed the lives of 130 settlers and reduced the countryside to ashes and ruins.
In response to the attacks, Governor Edward Hyde convinced the State Assembly to pass a bill to draft all men between the ages of 16 and 60, but even this measure proved insufficient because food and weapons were scarce and because the Quaker settlers refused to bear arms. Hyde sent to Virginia for assistance, but the Virginians would not advance their troops beyond the state line unless North Carolina would promise to surrender tracts of land along the border. Refusing to accept such political blackmail, Hyde solicited aid from South Carolina.
Without asking for concessions, the South Carolina government sent Col. John Barnwell, a veteran Indian fighter, with a force of 30 white officers and 500 Native Americans from an array of South Carolina tribes, including the Wateree, Congaree, Waxhaw, Pee Dee, Appalachee, and Yamasee. Having to travel over 300 miles through the wilderness, Barnwell didn't arrive until January 1712. Reinforced by 50 North Carolina militiamen, Barnwell forced the Tuscarora to retreat to a fort in Greene County, where they eventually surrendered and released their prisoners.
Explanation: