is there ever a right or wrong in historical interpretation? what value might historical inquiry have other than reaching a right or wrong conclusion?

Yes, there is a right or wrong way you can interpret a historical event.

Explanation:

Over dramatic, under dramatic, offensive, or wrong information that is given is the wrong way to interpret a historical event. Values that might help historical inquiry be correct are honesty, telling it exactly how it was, and giving facts is the right way to interpret a historical event. Going off of your own opinion, spreading false facts, spreading propaganda, picking sides, or making the "bad guy" seem even worse in the situation is the wrong way to interpret a historical event.

The third estate

Explanation:

The debt forced France King Louis VI to propose taxes on the third estate. The third estate was the middle-class people, who paid all the taxes, and had little rights in society. The laws and regulations, during the ancient regime, were much more checked toward the third estates. 80 per cent of France's population were from the third estate.

One of the taxes the third estate had to pay was Taille. Taille is a direct land tax for the peasantry to pay to the state. The middle-class people paid all the taxes so that the Empire could rule and protects its people.