brookieharrisop5n7us

28.09.2019 • 

History

Iwill make the first person who answers this !

scenario 2
state law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. the state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.
a young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. she agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. she signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. she says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.
the neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. he did not sign an official agreement to make payments. he says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. the neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.
is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? how do you know?
is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? how do you know?
determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. use details from the scenario to support your answer.


do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? in other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? use details from the scenario to support your answer.

Ответ:

sakugrey

04.01.2022

History

---

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? It's a civil law because it's a misunderstanding between two civilians. 

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know?  I believe it might be a combination of statue and regulation law because there's some documentation and exchange item.  

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is to protect the people's rights, not safety. " She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." The disagreement is over a vehicle which is just property. 

Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? I think she does not have a valid argument. " She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." If she wants to sell her car, she should have done it the proper way, otherwise she should be prepared to meet the consequences. 

---

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

alaj8600

21.11.2021

History

---

Over Time, the plant population grew taller and more dense creating forrests

---

0,0(0 оценок)