friendsalwaysbae
friendsalwaysbae
06.05.2020 • 
History

Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
dissenting opinion:
The state educator's undeniable, and undeniably vital,
mandate to (teach] moral and political values is not a
general warrant to act as "thought police" stifling
discussion of all but state-approved topics. ... Official
censorship of student speech on the ground that it
addresses "potentially sensitive topics" is...
impermissible. 5
A person who agrees with the dissenting opinion in this case would most
support which conclusion?
A The Court has
it to

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question