The decades around the year 50 bc saw the end of the roman republic, and the rise of the roman empire. what factors led to the decline of the roman republic? do you think there was any way for it to be preserved? what are the disadvantages of an empire compared with a republic?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- A Auto and Moto What to expect from the new VW Golf 7?...
- F Food and Cooking Everything You Need to Know About Pasta...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Get Rid of Peeling Nails: Natural Remedies...
- S Science and Technology Understanding Magnetic Storms: A Guide to This Natural Phenomenon...
- F Family and Home What is Most Important in Men s Lives?...
- G Goods and services Which TV is better - LCD or Plasma?...
- C Computers and Internet Are there special gaming mice?...
- G Goods and services LED-подсветка в LCD-телевизорах: 5 причин, почему она лучше других технологий...
- C Computers and Internet Keep Your Mouse Pad Clean: The Right Way to Clean It?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Why did progressives want to reorganize city government?...
- H History Read this excerpt from part 2 of the odyssey by homer. according to the excerpt, the cyclopes distinguishes them from other men cyclopes have no muster and no meeting, no consultation...
- B Business Any 20 names of service motive office.can younplease help me....
- C Chemistry convert a speed of 5.70 km/s to units of meter per hour. Show the unit analysis by dragging the conversion factors into the unit factor slots...
- B Biology Glycogenesis is stimulated by whereas glycogenolysis is stimulated by...
- P Physics Calculate the effective value of g, the acceleration of gravity, at 4,348 km above the earth’s surface...
- M Mathematics The function f is given by f(x) = 1 + 3 cosx. What is the average rate of change of f over the interval [0, pi]? A. -6/pi B. -2/pi C. 2/pi D. 1...
Ответ:
The aristocracy (wealthy class) dominated the early Roman Republic. In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote.
Tradition dictated that patricians and plebeians should be strictly separated; marriage between the two classes was even prohibited. Over time, the plebeians elected their own representatives, called tribunes, who gained the power to veto measures passed by the senate.
Gradually, the plebeians obtained even more power and eventually could hold the position of consul. Despite these changes, though, the patricians were still able to use their wealth to buy control and influence over elected leaders.
The Roman SenateThe history of the Roman Senate goes as far back as the history of Rome itself. It was first created as a 100-member advisory group for the Roman kings. Later kings expanded the group to 300 members. When the kings were expelled from Rome and the Republic was formed, the Senate became the most powerful governing body. Instead of advising the head of state, it elected the chief executives, called consuls.
Senators were, for centuries, strictly from the patrician class. They practiced the skills of rhetoric and oratory to persuade other members of the ruling body. The Senate convened and passed laws in the curia, a large building on the grounds of the Roman Forum. Much later, Julius Caesar built a larger curia for an expanded Senate.
By the 3rd century B.C.E., Rome had conquered vast territories, and the powerful senators sent armies, negotiated terms of treaties, and had total control over the financial matters of the Republic.
Senatorial control was eventually challenged by Dictator Sulla around 82 B.C.E. Sulla had hundreds of senators murdered, increased the Senate's membership to 600, and installed many nonpatricians as senators. Julius Caesar raised the number to 900 (it was reduced after his assassination). After the creation of the Roman Empire in 27 B.C.E., the Senate became weakened under strong emperors who often forcefully coerced this ruling body. Although it survived until the fall of Rome, the Roman Senate had become merely a ceremonial body of wealthy, intelligent men with no power to rule.Occasionally, an emergency situation (such as a war) arose that required the decisive leadership of one individual. Under these circumstances, the Senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. The position of dictator was very undemocratic in nature. Indeed, a dictator had all the power, made decisions without any approval, and had full control over the military.
The best example of an ideal dictator was a Roman citizen named Cincinnatus. During a severe military emergency, the Roman Senate called Cincinnatus from his farm to serve as dictator and to lead the Roman army. When Cincinnatus stepped down from the dictatorship and returned to his farm only 15 days after he successfully defeated Rome's enemies, the republican leaders resumed control over Rome.The early Roman Republic often found itself in a state of constant warfare with its surrounding neighbors. In one instance, when the Romans were fighting the Carthaginians, Rome was nearly conquered. The people of Carthage (a city in what is today Tunisia in north Africa) were a successful trading civilization whose interests began to conflict with those of the Romans.
The two sides fought three bloody wars, known as the Punic Wars (264-146 B.C.E.), over the control of trade in the western Mediterranean Sea. In the second war, Hannibal, a Carthaginian general, successfully invaded Italy by leading an army — complete with elephants — across the Alps. He handed the Roman army a crushing defeat but was unable to sack the city of Rome itself. After occupying and ravaging Italy for more than a decade, Hannibal was finally defeated by the Roman general Scipio at the Battle of Zama in 202 B.C.E. Hope You Like My Answer!:)
Ответ:
The larger star is likely to be the dimmer star.
Explanation:
As the temperature of the star often equates directly to how bright it would be as it is the heat emanating from the fission inside the star and the fusion of the gasses that illumines these stars it is sure that in the given conditions the larger star is to be dimmer.
This is because both stars have the same temperate. Now the temperature is the function of reactivity. Because it has the same temperature and the one star is bigger it would be considerably less reactive and thus it would be the dimmer star.