What is the status of ordinary citizens before the revolution? in french revolution and the american revolution?

Many of the objectives of both revolutions were similar: freedom, equality, the end of tyranny, the rule of law, etc. Moreover, they both desired a republican, democratic government. This is because the citizens of both countries shared many grievances. The people of both countries desired more participation in politics.

However, the United States was fighting against a different country (England), while France engaged in a civil war. This led to deeper divisions within French society. Moreover, before the revolution, the United States already had a more egalitarian system. French social classes, on the other hand, were extremely rigid. Therefore, long-lasting change was more difficult to achieve.

The United States was successful in remaining democratic and republican, while France struggled with various regime changes. The post-war period was relatively peaceful in America, while it was extremely bloody and violent in France.

illuminates the interplay between technical and academic mathematics. This collection of thought-provoking essays--by mathematicians, educators, and other experts--is enhanced with illustrative tasks from workplace and everyday contexts that suggest ways to strengthen high school mathematical education.

This important book addresses how to make mathematical education of all students meaningful--how to meet the practical needs of students entering the work force after high school as well as the needs of students going on to postsecondary education.

The short readable essays frame basic issues, provide background, and suggest alternatives to the traditional separation between technical and academic mathematics. They are accompanied by intriguing multipart problems that illustrate how deep mathematics functions in everyday settings--from analysis of ambulance response times to energy utilization, from buying a used car to "rounding off" to simplify problems.

The book addresses the role of standards in mathematics education, discussing issues such as finding common ground between science and mathematics education standards, improving the articulation from school to work, and comparing SAT results across settings.

Experts discuss how to develop curricula so that students learn to solve problems they are likely to encounter in life--while also providing them with approaches to unfamiliar problems. The book also addresses how teachers can help prepare students for postsecondary education.

For teacher education the book explores the changing nature of pedagogy and new approaches to teacher development. What kind of teaching will allow mathematics to be a guide rather than a gatekeeper to many career paths? Essays discuss pedagogical implication in problem-centered teaching, the role of complex mathematical tasks in teacher education, and the idea of making open-ended tasks--and the student work they elicit--central to professional discourse.

Explanation: