![rndbwls5760](/avatars/41725.jpg)
rndbwls5760
26.08.2019 •
History
What kind of imagery did jonathan edwards use in his sermons and to what effect
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking Why Doesn t the Confirmation Link Come to Email?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment What Movies You Should Watch: A Guideline to Make the Right Decision...
- F Family and Home How to Choose a Baby Stroller: Tips from Experienced Parents...
- H Health and Medicine 5 Simple Steps to Quit Smoking for Good...
- H Health and Medicine Coughing: Causes, Types, and Treatment Methods...
- H Health and Medicine How to Treat the Flu: A Comprehensive Guide...
- O Other What is a Disk Emulsifier and How Does it Work?...
- F Family and Home What does a newborn need?...
- F Family and Home Choosing the Right Car Seat for Your Child: Tips and Recommendations...
Answers on questions: History
- H History What were the effects of the treaty of tordesillas on the european possessions in the caribbean?...
- H History What effects did self-determination had in ww1...
- H History Skilled workers who made metal product, cloth, or pottery were called a) priests b)artisans c)scribes d)heroes...
- H History Print е to Which question is not answered by the Article? А How does Brackens honor the history of the many Black cowboys in the old American West? to S B Why do many of Brackens...
- H History Porque los Británicos subieron los impuestos en las colonias Americanas?...
- H History Which was an accomplishment of the Freedmen s Bureau? A) They established public schools in the South. B) They worked to limit the rights of former slaves. C) They persuaded former...
- H History 1.What is a muckcracker? 2. What role did muckcrackers play in the progressive moment...
- H History Washington crushed an uprising over whiskey taxes using the new federal army 1.Judiciary Act of 1789 2.Whiskey Rebellion 3.Farewell Address 4.Battle of Fallen Timbers...
- H History Please help Who believed in the divine right of kings? Question 7 options: A) Montesquieu B) John Locke C) Voltaire D) Louis XIV...
- H History i will give brainliest to the person who helps me in the next 5 mins please help fast its important 12 points too Do you think that Lamar’s presidency was successful or unsuccessful?...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Marbury v. Madison, which relied on precedent
Explanation:
The Marbury v. Madison case (5 US 137 1870) is a judicial proceeding before the Supreme Court of the United States and resolved in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 judges of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.
The new secretary of state of President Jefferson's government, James Madison, refused to hand over the appointment records because the new government was irritated by the federalists' maneuver to try to secure control of the judiciary by appointing members of its board. party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.
If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judicial Law, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.