Which of the following was NOT a reason given in favor of restricting immigration?
1) Immigrants took American jobs.
2) Immigrants brought undesirable customs to the U.S.
3) Immigrants introduced unwelcome political ideas.
4) Immigrants took too much land away from Western settlers.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine Understanding Pregnancy Tests: What You Need to Know?...
- H Health and Medicine What Makes a Man a Man?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Spam in ICQ?...
- A Art and Culture Who Said The Less We Love a Woman, the More She Likes Us ?...
- F Family and Home How to Get Rid of Your Neighbors?...
- S Society and Politics How Could Nobody Know About the Dead Mountaineers?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Cure Adenoids?...
- H Health and Medicine Why Wearing a Back Brace Can Be Beneficial During Back Strain?...
- S Sport When and Where Will the 2014 World Cup be Held?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
Answers on questions: History
- M Mathematics Gravel is being dumped from a conveyor belt at a rate of 40 ft3/min, and its coarseness is such that it forms a pile in the shape of a cone whose base diameter and height...
- M Mathematics An artist receives a request from a client to create a rug that is the shape of a parallelogram. the artist charges $25 per square foot of rug. the client decides to...
- S Social Studies The tea party movement blames the obama administration for the wall street and banking bailouts even though it was the administration that originally called for the bailout....
- M Mathematics Free Points answer i basically report all ur questions and get u banned...
Ответ:
The first one since it's just ignorant, anyone can get a job it's only the matter if they know how to do and if they are good at it, if they are pressed about the Raza (Hispanics/ or in this case any race) getting jobs, that's on them.
Ответ:
According to what the author expresses in this excerpt, in order to confirm the authorship of a document, handwritten ink signatures should be present. Otherwise, there would be no reliable way of verifying the source of that document.
Explanation:
The main reason for Simon Singh to believe that is that, if we don't have a handwritten signature, we could be easily fooled by criminals who take other people's names to make us do things for their own benefit, like in the example given by the author of the bank account. I think his claim is pretty accurate and that the example given by the author supports the claim in a very logical way. I, in fact, agree with him in believing that handwritten signatures or any other way of pursuing reliability is worth the time and intention. Nothing is too much when trying to avoid fraud, and I also think it is a good practice to update the protection system every now and then to maintain our information private and secure.