Which states mostly supported the use of Federal military force to enforce laws - northern states or southern states? What does this indicate about their view on state’s rights

The fact that Northern states had a far stronger attachment to the federal government was one of the key contrasts between Northern and Southern states.

This is a clear illustration of how the northern states have backed the federal government's powers to a larger extent, in exchange for state governments' limited power.

About Northern states and southern states:

The deployment of federal military force to enforce laws was most popular in northern states.Southern states, on the other hand, believed that the federal government should stay out of state politics.This demonstrates that Southern states valued state autonomy and considered that state rights needed to be protected against federal authority.

For more information about northern states or southern states refer to the link:

link

The states that most supported the use of federal military force to enforce laws were the northern states, which supported this situation mainly during the Reconstruction period, after the end of the Civil War, where the southern states were directly intervened by the Federal Government, managed by the northern states.

This is a clear example of how the northern states, historically, supported the powers of the Federal Government to a greater extent, seeking in turn a limited power from the state governments. On the other hand, the southern states, historically, were always defenders of the autonomy of the states from the Federal Government, which they sought to limit by guaranteeing for themselves the rights of nullification and secession.

Muir was directly involved in establishing Yosemite [1890], Sequoia [1890], Mount Rainier [1899], and Grand Canyon [1908] National Parks. ... Muir and the Sierra Club fought many battles to protect Yosemite and the Sierra Nevada. He served as the Club's president until his death in 1914.