Why is attila the hun a controversial historical figure? historians don’t know much about the origin of the huns. although he could be cruel and savage, he was also a just and fair leader. attila negotiated a treaty with the roman empire but later broke it. historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

the answer is b the other guy is wrong

Explanation:

im smart

The correct answer is:
Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.

Well Even though the Congress passed the Executive Order 9980, allowing African Americans into the workforce, racism was still in effect. President Truman wanted to desegregate everyone because he found from his Committee on Civil Rights found that discriminatory practices pervaded Federal agencies. With that evidence, President Truman issued the order. Truman appointed heads of each department or agency responsible.  Within a year, eighteen agencies had desegregated, and some agency heads that had not cooperated were removed from their positions.