Why may judicial interpretations of the u.s constitution change over time? select all that apply.
a.evolving attitudes of the public
b.executive instruction
c.change to the bill of rights
d.current events
e.ideologies of individual justices

I would say A) evolving attitudes of the public, D) current events, and E) ideologies of individual justices.

I don't think B is correct because the judicial branch is supposed to act as a check against the executive branch and therefore cannot be instructed to rule a certain way by any president, and I don't think C is correct because changes to the bill of rights would have less impact on interpretation of the constitution and more of an impact on the constitution/law itself

James madison, alexander hamilton, and john jay all did