Hardydonotmess1
Hardydonotmess1
01.08.2020 • 
Mathematics

An article in the Journal of Aircraft (Vol. 23, 1986, pp. 859-864) described a new equivalent plate analysis method formulation that is capable of modeling aircraft structures such as cranked wing boxes and that produces results similar to the more computationally intensive finite element analysis method. Natural vibration frequencies for the cranked wing box structure are calculated using both methods, and results for the first seven natural frequencies follow: Frequency Finite Element Equivalent Plate
1 14.48 14.79
2 48.45 49.08
3 97.13 99.98
4 113.97 117.43
5 174.75 181.18
6 212.54 220.06
7 277.40 294.79
(a) Do the data suggest that the two methods provide the same mean value for natural vibration frequency? Use
α = 0.05.
(b) Find a 95% confidence interval on the mean difference between the two methods. Round your answers to three decimal places (e.g. 98.765).

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question