Can some one lifed me up and help find my love that i dont have

huh???

Step-by-step explanation:

hey ...I would but I need comfort for my slef

Step-by-step explanation:

my grandpa just died

Part A: Answer in explanation area. Picture 2 is the final solution.

Part B: No. It is not in the shaded region (orange) or either line in quadrant 1. I also provided an algebraic reason in the explanation.

Part C: Answer in explanation. (I chose (3,0) and provided a picture of the chosen point in picture 4).

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A:

I'm going to solve both inequalities for y.

Subtract on both sides:

Reorder right side:

Divide both sides by 3:

So this means I will shade below the line since we have y is less than.

I'm going to graph using the x- and y- intercepts.

To find the x-intercept set y=0 giving you which implies x=8[/tex].

To find the y-intercept set x=0 giving you which implies giving us .

So I graphed the two points (8,0) and (0,2.7) roughly on my coordinate plane.

Remember I'm going to shade below it.

I graphed those 2 points in blue. The line (in dark green) was solid because of the equal part of the inequality.

I symbolized the shading for this inequality in light green.

Subtract on both sides:

Reorder right hand side:

So the y-intercept is 2 and the slope is -1 (-1/1=down 1/right 1).

I'm going to graph (0,2) in red and the point (0+1,2-1)=(1,1) in red.

This line is also solid and I will connect them with a dark purple line.

The shading is above because it said y greater than.

The intersection of the the shaded regions along with the boundary lines in quadrant 1 are a solution to the inequality. So where you see purple and green is the area we are talking about.; the area, between the lines in quadrant 1.

Part B:

(8,2) is in picture 3.

(8,2) is not on either line in Quadrant 1 and it is also not located between them in the shaded region.

Therefore, it is not a solution.

We can also verify this algebraically.

In order for it to be a solution it must satisfy both inequalities.

with :

is not true so (8,2) is not a solution and we don't even have to check the second inequality as it had to be a solution to both.

Part C:

Let's choose (3,0).

x represents the number of dry food.

y represents the number of wet food.

So this means we just but 3 things of dry food and no wet food.

3 things of dry food will feed 2 dogs plus 1 more.

This will also cost us 3+3(0)=3 dollars which is less than 8 dollars.