destinywiggins75
02.08.2019 •
Mathematics
Which of te following numbers is greater 3/5. 33/50, 303/500, 3003/5000 or 30,003/50,000
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Get Rid of Peeling Nails: Natural Remedies...
- S Science and Technology Understanding Magnetic Storms: A Guide to This Natural Phenomenon...
- F Family and Home What is Most Important in Men s Lives?...
- G Goods and services Which TV is better - LCD or Plasma?...
- C Computers and Internet Are there special gaming mice?...
- G Goods and services LED-подсветка в LCD-телевизорах: 5 причин, почему она лучше других технологий...
- C Computers and Internet Keep Your Mouse Pad Clean: The Right Way to Clean It?...
- C Computers and Internet 3D Glasses! What is this thing?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Reinstall Windows: A Detailed Guide for Beginners...
Answers on questions: Mathematics
- M Mathematics A small plane flies 760,320 yards in 2 hours. Use the formula d = rt, where d represents distance, r represents rate, and t represents time, to answer the following...
- M Mathematics Convert 5 11 to a decimal using long division....
- M Mathematics Which statement explains the result of dividing 20 by 120...
- M Mathematics Niles and bob sailed at the same time for the same length of time. niles sailboat traveled 45 miles at a speed of 9 mph, while bob s motorboat traveled 70 miles at...
- M Mathematics How to write 5n – 10 26 in words...
- M Mathematics Pythagorean thereom: problem in picture ( problem 1)...
- M Mathematics Lmno is a parallelogram. if nm= x+5 and ol = 2x+3, find the value of x,nm and ol...
- M Mathematics If you have 64 pieces of candy and you want to split them equally how many piles will you have?...
- M Mathematics The price of a fan is $15 the price is 25%lower than last week....
- M Mathematics Which of the interpretations for the given expression is correct?...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) Yes, if you enter all 43 values into your calculator, you calculator should report:
xbar = 2.293
s = 1.401
(b)
Note: Most professors say that is sigma = the population standard deviation is unknown (as it is unknown here), you should construct a t-confidence interval.
xbar +/- t * s / sqrt(n)
2.293 - 1.684 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 1.933
2.293 - 1.684 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 2.653
(1.933, 2.653)
Note: To find the t-value that allows us to be 90% confident, go across from df = 43-1 = 42 (round down to 40 to be conservative since 42 in not in the table) and down from (1-.90)/2 = .05 or up from 90% depending on your t-table. So, the t-critical value is 1.684.
Note: If you can use the TI-83/84, it will construct the following CI using df = 42 (ie t = 1.681).
2.293 +/- 1.681 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)
(1.934, 2.652)
Note: Some professors want you to construct a z-CI when the sample size is large. If your professor says this, the correct 90% CI is:
2.293 +/- 1.645 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)
(1.942, 2.644)
Note: To find the z-value that allows us to be 90% confident, (1) using the z-table, look up (1-.90)/2 = .05 inside the z-table, or (2) using the t-table, go across from infinity df (= z-values) and down from .05 or up from 90% depending on your t-table. Either way, the z-critical value is 1.645.
(c)
Note: Again, most professors say that is sigma = the population standard deviation is unknown (as it is unknown here), you should construct a t-confidence interval.
xbar +/- t * s / sqrt(n)
2.293 - 2.704 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 1.715
2.293 - 2.704 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 2.871
(1.715, 2.871)
Note: To find the t-value that allows us to be 99% confident, go across from df = 43-1 = 42 (round down to 40 to be conservative since 42 in not in the table) and down from (1-.99)/2 = .005 or up from 99% depending on your t-table. So, the t-critical value is 2.704.
Note: If you can use the TI-83/84, it will construct the following CI using df = 42 (ie t = 2.698).
2.293 +/- 2.698 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)
(1.717, 2.869)
Note: Again, some professors want you to construct a z-CI when the sample size is large. If your professor says this, the correct 99% CI is:
2.293 +/- 2.576 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)
(1.742, 2.843)
Note: To find the z-value that allows us to be 99% confident, (1) using the z-table, look up (1-.99)/2 = .005 inside the z-table, or (2) using the t-table, go across from infinity df (= z-values) and down from .005 or up from 99% depending on your t-table. Either way, the z-critical value is 2.576.
(d)
Tim Huelett 2.5
Since 2.5 falls between (1.715, 2.871), we see that Tim Huelett falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage is NOT significantly different than the population average.
Herb Hunter 2.0
Since 2.0 falls between (1.715, 2.871), we see that Herb Hunter falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage is NOT significantly different than the population average.
Jackie Jensen 3.8.
Since 3.8 falls above (1.715, 2.871), we see that Jackie Jensen falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage IS significantly GREATER than the population average.
(e)
Because of the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), since our sample size is large, we do NOT have to make the normality assumption since the CLT tells us that the sampling distribution of xbar will be approximatley normal even if the underlying population distribution is not.