The judicial test that places the burden of proof on government to show that a race-based policy serves a "compelling interest," is "narrowly tailored," and uses the "least restrictive means" for achieving its compelling interest is called:

STRICT SCRUTINY

Explanation:

Strict scrutiny is the highest form of judicial review process through which judge requests the government to provide a proof for a certain matter or issue.

STRICT SCRUTINY IS SPECIFICALLY ADOPTED OR APPLIED BY JUDGES WHEN A CASE CONCERNING THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OR A CASE INVOLVING GOVERNMENT ACTION IS NEEDED IN ORDER TO CLASSIFY A SUSPECT BASED ON RACE OR NATIONALITY.

ANSWER: STRICT SCRUTINY

EXPLANATION: STRICT SCRUTINY is the tool used in the United States of America to incorporate standard judicial review.

However, the aftermath of this review may occur as striking down a law by the judge unless the government show proof or demonstrate in court that a law or regulation have this three points.

A. serves a "compelling state interest";

B. is "narrowly tailored" to achieving this compelling purpose;

C. uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.

Conclusively, this review represent a degree of standards that courts established to determine a constitutional right or principle, and government's interest in regards to the principle observance.

Mitch bought 2 buckets of wings.