ronii73
02.03.2021 •
Social Studies
Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians'
arguments?
A. Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not
experience the American Revolution,
B. Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that
support their arguments.
C. Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than
making any strong claims,
D. Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about
the American Revolution.
PREVIOUS
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking Unusually Delicious Shashlik - Follow the Etiquette of Proper Preparation!...
- L Leisure and Entertainment Couchsurfing: A New Way to Travel...
- G Goods and services Which TV is better - LCD or Plasma?...
- S Sport How to Learn to Pull Up on Monkey Bars?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment Scrapbooking: What is it and Why is it Becoming More Popular?...
- C Computers and Internet Where did torrents.ru move to?...
- B Business and Finance Understanding Cash Flow: What It Is and How It Works...
- C Computers and Internet What Are Peers and Seeds in Torrenting?...
- H Health and Medicine 10 Simple Techniques on How to Boost Your Mood...
- G Goods and services How to Choose the Right High Chair for Your Baby?...
Answers on questions: Social Studies
- H History Should we have gotten involved in Korea and Vietnam? Why or Why not? I am need of help with this question, any help is very appreciated!!!...
- H Health The chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by scaly red patches is called:...
- B Biology Which expression results when (9x2 - 9x + 1) is subtracted from (12x2 + 4x - 5)?...
- B Business Which of the following statements is true regarding the amortization of intangible assets? in recording amortization, an accumulated amortization account is always used.incorrect...
Ответ:
a) Resilience
Explanation:
In psychology, resilience refers to the process of adapting well in the face of adversity, trauma or significant sources of stress (like family and relationship problems or financial stressors). It's not only about adapting well to those but also to "bounce back" from them and come out being stronger and better than how one was before the stressors came into our lives.
At 6 year old, Billy met all developmental tasks and showed well adjust (he had a loving family). Kyle tested clinically significant for behavioral problems (he was living in poverty after being abandoned by his parents).
Years later, both of them are evaluated and are found well adjusted and developing normally. Kyle mentioned that he became active in sports and was mentored by caring adults.
We can see that Kyle had significant sources of stress while growing up (family problems and financial problems) but he bounce back from them by starting to play sports and have mentors in his life who gave him the support he needed.
Thus, the right answer is a) Resilience (we can say that it's also "equifinality" whose definition is " how different early experiences in life can lead to similar outcomes" although is important to notice that equifinality is usually used to refer to negative outcomes while resilience is used to refer to positive ones)
Note:
b) Multifinality: Both boys had the same outcome at the end so this is not an example of multifinality.
c) Unstable, maladaptive development: Both bous were well adjusted and developing normal so this cannot be the answer.
d) Non-normative development: This term refers to the development that doesn't go according to the rules according to the stage people are going through. In this case, both boys are developing normal.