Why are aquifers important
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Style and Beauty How are artificial nails removed?...
- S Style and Beauty Secrets of Tying a Pareo: 5 Ways...
- F Food and Cooking 10 Reasons Why You Should Avoid Giving Re-Gifts: An Informative Guide...
- S Sport How to wrap boxing hand wraps? Everything you need to know!...
- A Animals and plants 5 Tips for Taking Care of Yews to Keep Them Green and Beautiful...
- H Health and Medicine How to Calm Your Nerves? Expert Tips That Actually Work...
- O Other What is a Disk Emulsifier and How Does it Work?...
- S Sport How to Pump Your Chest Muscle? Secrets of Training...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of 3pic Infector: Everything You Need to Know...
- S Style and Beauty How to Grow Hair Faster: Real Methods and Advice...
Answers on questions: Biology
- B Biology Foces 9. Assume that a species of animal has a very restricted diet; it eats only two species of plants. Using the word niche” in your answer, explain why this species...
- B Biology What makes protein and nucleic acid different from carbohydrates and lipids?...
- B Biology Þ. Which statement best explains why the mitosis model on the previous page is incomplete in regards to the number of chromosomes? A. Human cells should have more...
- B Biology Compare herbivores, carnivores, omnivores, and detrovores...
- B Biology How could the presence or absence of protein determine a phenotype apex...
- B Biology PLEASE HURRY What is the density of a cube of wood with sides 5 cm and a mass of 100 g?...
- B Biology Biology B unit 1 Evolution Test answers lesson 20 Someone HALP...
- B Biology Which characteristics do all seed plants have in common? Check all that apply. phloem pollen spores xylem seeds...
- B Biology Do saturated fats have single carbon-to-carbon bonds or at least one double carbon-to-carbon bond?...
- B Biology Which stars are white dwarfs?...
Ответ:
Ответ:
They hold water that humans can consume.
Explanation:
Ответ:
When members of a population engage in dyadic interactions reflecting a prisoner's dilemma game, the evolutionary dynamics depends crucially on the population structure, described by means of graphs and networks. Here, we investigate how selection pressure contributes to change the fate of the population. We find that homogeneous networks, in which individuals share a similar number of neighbors, are very sensitive to selection pressure, whereas strongly heterogeneous networks are more resilient to natural selection, dictating an overall robust evolutionary dynamics of coordination. Between these extremes, a whole plethora of behaviors is predicted, showing how selection pressure can change the nature of dilemmas populations effectively face. We further show how the present results for homogeneous networks bridge the existing gap between analytic predictions obtained in the framework of the pair-approximation from very weak selection and simulation results obtained from strong selection.
Complex networks are ubiquitous and known to profoundly affect the processes that take place on them [1–5]. From a theoretical perspective, some of the most complex processes studied to date, occurring on complex networks, are related to behavioral dynamics and decision-making, often described by means of social dilemmas of cooperation [6]. Among these, prisoner's dilemma (PD) provides the most popular metaphor of such dilemmas, given that its only Nash equilibrium is mutual defection, despite mutual cooperation providing higher returns [7]—thus the dilemma. We may also assume a dynamical (evolutionary) approach to game theory [8, 9], where individuals revise their behavior based on the perceived success of other individuals, creating a gradient of selection (GoS) [10] that dictates the evolution of cooperation in time. In this context, such GoS will always favor free-riders irrespective of the fraction of cooperators and of the relative importance of fitness in the evolutionary process, a result that dictates the demise of cooperation in the population [9].
This result that translates the forecast stemming from a game-theoretical analysis based on Nash equilibrium into a population-wide, dynamical setting, assumes that populations are large and well mixed, that is, everyone interacts with everyone else with equal probability [8]. Yet, when members of a population interact along the links of an underlying complex network this scenario is altered, as the assumption of a well-mixed population no longer holds [6, 11–13]. Only recently has it become possible to analyze the population-wide evolutionary dynamics of a game played on an arbitrarily complex network, very much in the same manner that games were analyzed in well-mixed populations [14]. The so-called average gradient of selection (AGoS, see section 2 for details) has unraveled the fundamental changes in evolutionary game dynamics introduced in populations structured along the links of complex networks. While further analysis is required for other classes of dilemmas [6, 15–17], the results obtained from the PD [14] show that, at a population-wide level (what we call macro-dynamics) the effective game at stake can be very different from that in which pairs of individuals engage (what we call micro-dynamics), with direct implications both in the time-evolution and invasion of cooperation, analogous to what occurs in finite well-mixed populations [18]. In particular, homogeneous networks seem to favor the co-existence of strategies, whereas heterogeneous networks, in turn, favor their coordination [14], irrespective of the fact that the game individuals locally perceive and play is a PD