![blanca04fp](/avatars/24097.jpg)
blanca04fp
11.03.2020 •
Business
Assuming that Caleb is correct about the amount of contact that Wizard Internet has had with people in Montana, is it likely that the courts in Montana would have jurisdiction over Wizard?
a. Probably, since anyone in Montana can pull up the website.
b. Probably since Montana is in the United States.
c. Probably not, since the company has not reached out to anyone in Montana.
d. Probably not since the company is not located in Montana.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- W Work and Career Everything You Need to Know About MBA Programs...
- S Sport How to Do Push-ups Correctly?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Grow Hair Faster: Real Methods and Advice...
- F Family and Home How to Remove Fading from Clothes: Tips and Tricks...
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Polendwitsa at Home?...
- F Family and Home Parents or Environment: Who Has the Most Influence on a Child s Upbringing?...
- P Philosophy Unbelievable stories of encounters with otherworldly forces...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Choose the Perfect Gift for Men on February 23rd?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Treat Whooping Cough in Children?...
- H Health and Medicine Simple Ways to Lower Cholesterol in the Blood: Tips and Tricks...
Answers on questions: Business
- B Business The first day of work for Prevosti Farms and Sugarhouse for all employees is February 4, 2019. February 8 is the end of the first pay period for Prevosti Farms and Sugarhouse...
- B Business KILLA QUEEN DAISAN NO BAKUDA BITSA DA DUSTU...
- M Mathematics Can some help me thank you...
- B Biology Which of the following would best serve to repair the stratosphere ozone layer...
- W World Languages Odmień przez przypadki dobra książka/dobre książki(podaj pełne nazwy przypadków i podstawowe pytania)...
- H History What was one of president Johnson’s first official acts as a president...
- H Health Can i ever count the stars if i take my time?...
- M Mathematics Find the 100th term in the arithmetic sequence 0,5,10,15...
- M Mathematics See my art everybody...
- H History Which adjective BEST describes the surrender terms that Ulysses S. Grant offered Robert E. Lee? a generous c. unrealistic weak...
Ответ:
option (C). Probably not, since the company has not reached out to anyone in Montana.
Explanation:- in the example given, Assuming that Caleb is correct about the amount of contact that Wizard Internet has had with people in Montana, is it likely that the courts in Montana would have jurisdiction over Wizard? The answer is Probably not, since the company has not reached out to anyone in Montana. Simply having a website with passive advertising that can be acccessed in Montana is not enough reason for a courts in Montana to have jurisdiction over wizard.
Ответ:
Letter from Chief John RossIt is well known that for a number of years past we have been harassed by a series of vexations, which it is deemed unnecessary to recite in detail, but the evidence of which our delegation will be prepared to furnish. With a view to bringing our troubles to a close, a delegation was appointed on the 23rd of October, 1835, by the General Council of the nation, clothed with full powers to enter into arrangements with the Government of the United States, for the final adjustment of all our existing difficulties. The delegation failing to effect an arrangement with the United States commissioner, then in the nation, proceeded, agreeably to their instructions in that case, to Washington City, for the purpose of negotiating a treaty with the authorities of the United States.
After the departure of the Delegation, a contract was made by the Rev. John F. Schermerhorn, and certain individual Cherokees, purporting to be a "treaty, concluded at New Echota, in the State of Georgia, on the 29th day of December, 1835, by General William Carroll and John F. Schermerhorn, commissioners on the part of the United States, and the chiefs, headmen, and people of the Cherokee tribes of Indians." A spurious Delegation, in violation of a special injunction of the general council of the nation, proceeded to Washington City with this pretended treaty, and by false and fraudulent representations supplanted in the favor of the Government the legal and accredited Delegation of the Cherokee people, and obtained for this instrument, after making important alterations in its provisions, the recognition of the United States Government. And now it is presented to us as a treaty, ratified by the Senate, and approved by the President [Andrew Jackson], and our acquiescence in its requirements demanded, under the sanction of the displeasure of the United States, and the threat of summary compulsion, in case of refusal. It comes to us, not through our legitimate authorities, the known and usual medium of communication between the Government of the United States and our nation, but through the agency of a complication of powers, civil and military.
By the stipulations of this instrument, we are despoiled of our private possessions, the indefeasible property of individuals. We are stripped of every attribute of freedom and eligibility for legal self-defence. Our property may be plundered before our eyes; violence may be committed on our persons; even our lives may be taken away, and there is none to regard our complaints. We are denationalized; we are disfranchised. We are deprived of membership in the human family! We have neither land nor home, nor resting place that can be called our own. And this is effected by the provisions of a compact which assumes the venerated, the sacred appellation of treaty.
We are overwhelmed! Our hearts are sickened, our utterance is paralized, when we reflect on the condition in which we are placed, by the audacious practices of unprincipled men, who have managed their stratagems with so much dexterity as to impose on the Government of the United States, in the face of our earnest, solemn, and reiterated protestations.
The instrument in question is not the act of our Nation; we are not parties to its covenants; it has not received the sanction of our people. The makers of it sustain no office nor appointment in our Nation, under the designation of Chiefs, Head men, or any other title, by which they hold, or could acquire, authority to assume the reins of Government, and to make bargain and sale of our rights, our possessions, and our common country. And we are constrained solemnly to declare, that we cannot but contemplate the enforcement of the stipulations of this instrument on us, against our consent, as an act of injustice and oppression, which, we are well persuaded, can never knowingly be countenanced by the Government and people of the United States; nor can we believe it to be the design of these honorable and highminded individuals, who stand at the head of the Govt., to bind a whole Nation, by the acts of a few unauthorized individuals. And, therefore, we, the parties to be affected by the result, appeal with confidence to the justice, the magnanimity, the compassion, of your honorable bodies, against the enforcement, on us, of the provisions of a compact, in the formation of which we have had no agency.