bvghchg4401
bvghchg4401
02.08.2019 • 
Business

Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america—the union that represented horton's workers—negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee's discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged its employee, ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but "was not totally convinced" that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated to his job. can a court set aside this order from the arbitrator?

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question