![isiahemerson0](/avatars/34798.jpg)
isiahemerson0
05.10.2019 •
Business
How much liability coverage does the average small need
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking Is Bacon Good for You?...
- S Style and Beauty Discover the Art of Nail Design: How Do You Paint Your Nails?...
- P Philosophy How to Develop Extrasensory Abilities?...
- O Other Everything You Need to Know About Kudyabliks...
- C Computers and Internet The Twitter Phenomenon: What it is and How to Use it...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Laptop: Expert Guide and Tips...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Where Did Tarot Cards Come From?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Make Your Lips Fuller? Ideas and Tips for Beautiful Lips...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
Ответ:
Ответ:
General insurance cost:
1.Photo and video= $275 annually
2.Barber shop=$450 annually
3.Cable,dish installer=$550 annually
4.Small retail store=$750 annually
5.Computer repair=$400 annually
Explanation:
Liability coverage is like contingent liability that may occur in future to reduce that risk we do coverage of that resource doing insurance.
Insurance companies usually charge premium with respect to degree of risk in that industry like shipping industry,they charge high premium and less in health care and Information technology due their low risk.
Ответ:
A (5,250) sold at split-off
B 22,625 continue
C (10,400) sold at split-off
Explanation:
Result for further processing:
quantity ( further process price - raw price) less further processing cost
Product A
13,800 pounds x (29.5 - 24) - 81,150 = (5,250)
Product B
21,500 pounds (24.50 - 18) - 117,125 = 22,625
Product C
5,000 gallon ( 38.5 - 30) - 52,900 = (10,400)
We must understand that the join processing cost are already incurred (sunk) therefore, not relevant. We hould check if the further process increases or not the gross profit.
As B is the only which increase the gross profit we continue the processing. THe other product based on our cost structure are not viable