hjgdk6891
hjgdk6891
14.02.2020 • 
Business

If the paper from every morning edition of the nation's largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is un-necessary, however, since the newspaper maintains its own forests to ensure an un-interrupted supply of paper.
1. Firstly, what evidence is there that if the company were to put a plan in place to recycle existing newspapers that it would be un-necessary?
2. Would it not contribute to an increase in the bottom line if the company doesn't have to spend time and money on cutting down new tress to produce the newspapers, in addition to being environmentally friendly?
3. Thirdly, what if newspapers become more popular and the company must print more and produce a greater volume?
4. Would the existing forest be able to maintain the volume without any disruption or would the company need to look at buying more land to ensure a continuous supply?
5. What costs would be associated with that possibility, and can the company realistically invest capital if they do not have it?

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question