Robert Nozick's direct criticism of the importance of income equality is that: a. trade performed on a cumulative basis would result in equal outcomes and opportunities for people. b. All of the answers are correct. c. peaceful trade should not be condemned even when it leads to large differences in wealth. d. equality results only from freely chosen market transactions, devoid of coercive force or fraud.

c. peaceful trade should not be condemned even when it leads to large differences in wealth.

Explanation:

Income inequality simply refers to the unevenly distribution of income in a population. It should be noted that the less equal the distribution, the higher the income inequality will be.

According to Robert Nozick, the direct criticism of the importance of income equality is that peaceful trade should not be condemned even when it leads to large differences in wealth.

. . . . . . . .dndbdhdbx