Velma and Bud divorced. Velma's attorney fee of $5,000 is allocated as follows: General representation in obtaining the divorce $1,500 Services in obtaining custody of the child 900 Services in settlement of martial property 600 Determining the tax consequences of: Dependency deduction for child 700 Tax Consequences of property settlement 1,300 Of the $5,000 Velma pays to her attorney in 2020, the amount she may deduct as an itemized deduction is:

Truly enterprises, and the corporate chiefs ought to be held at risk for their criminal activities.  

The subject of forcing criminal risk to an enterprise for criminal offences carried out by chiefs, supervisors, officials and different representatives of the partnership while directing corporate undertakings has increased a great deal of significance in the statute of criminal law. The very reason for the chance of forcing criminal obligation to a partnership is its autonomous legitimate character.  

The customary view was that a company couldn't be blameworthy of a wrongdoing, since criminal blame required aim and an organization not having a psyche could shape no expectation. What's more, an organization had no body that could be detained. So courts are probably going to force criminal obligation on an organization when the criminal demonstration is mentioned, approved, or performed by the governing body, an official or someone else having duty regarding planning organization strategy or significant level chairman having supervisory duty over the topic of the offence and acting inside the extent of his work. This is as per the office hypothesis.