9) Which BEST defines abolition as it is used in section four of this
passage?
nis
cal
A)
the act of ending slavery
nan
of
B)
the act of asking for pardon
C)
the act of peaceful resistance
e
re
faolishing unequivocal recantation
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- P Photography and Videography How to Choose a Digital Camera?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Properly Order Clothing from International Online Stores...
- F Food and Cooking How to Calculate the Gender of Your Child with Blood?...
- S Society and Politics 10 Tips for Boosting Your Self-Esteem...
- C Computers and Internet How to Create a Folder on Your iPhone?...
- G Goods and services How to sew a ribbon: Tips for beginners...
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Mayonnaise at Home? Secrets of Homemade Mayonnaise...
- C Computers and Internet Which Phone is Best for Internet Surfing?...
- F Food and Cooking Everything You Need to Know About Pasta...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
Answers on questions: English
- E English In Angela s Ashes, which inference can be best made about Sister Rita? a) She has worked at many hospitals.b) She is very religious.d) She bends the rules for people she likes.d)...
- M Mathematics Which statement is true? a. – 17 –20 b. 12=84 c. 8.01 8.001 d. −23 –6...
- B Business The following jobs are waiting to be processed at rick solano s machine center. solano s machine center has a relatively long backlog and sets a fresh schedule every 2 weeks, which...
- E English They soon knew that they(7)(take) the wrong way....
- A Arts What are the effects of plagiarism on scholarships?...
Ответ:
Explanation:
The semi-barbaric king's approach to justice has little to do with the proven innocence or guilt of the accused. Because the accused party selects his own punishment when he chooses a door (and by the way, only men seem to be capable of potentially criminal behavior in this particular kingdom), the king is able to justify in his own mind the inarguable fairness of his judicial system: the criminal chose to do something morally questionable, therefore the criminal chooses his own consequence.
Clearly, this system is flawed in many ways. The accused criminal has no agency when it comes to the door selection situation in the first place. As well, in many cases, the door obscuring the lady may conceal a punishment only somewhat less terrifying than the tiger, despite the fact that she is young and pretty; what if the accused was already happily married? Or what if the lady and the accused didn't actually like each other? A marriage to someone unsuitable can be a punishment in its own right, so the king is not actually providing a fair reward for innocence.
The narrator does not state that the king's subjects find this system perfectly fair. They enjoy the spectacle it provides, and "the thinking part of the community could bring no charge of unfairness against this plan," but enjoyment and denial do not mean tacit agreement.