At the end of chapter three, Mr. Bedford is having an internal conflict about whether or not he should actually attempt to go to the moon. In about 150 words, write a letter to Mr. Bedford from his future self. Offer advice as to whether he should go with Mr. Cavor, or not. Provide at least three reasons to convince him. Key Point! Whenever you argue a point, consider the reader's counter-arguments. What reasons does Mr. Bedford have for wanting to go and what reasons does he have for not going? Be sure to confront these in your letter.

Okay so:

Mr Cavor should definitely make an attempt to go to the moon and not leave this opportunity.

"The first set in the moon" has been written by an English author, H.G. Wells. It is a scientific romance written by this author. The novel tells the story of a journey to the Moon undertaken by the two protagonists, a businessman narrator, Mr. Bedford, and an eccentric scientist, Mr. Cavor.

Mr Cavor is in a dilemma that whether he should go to the moon or not and discover it but according to me this opportunity should not be missed. This is not an opportunity that bangs on the door again and again. So when it comes, it should be availed as soon as possible.

Explanation:

I did NOT write this, this was something found from another source but I thought you might be able to use it and reword and find out for yourself! Hoped this helped!

Mr Cavor should definitely make an attempt to go to the moon and not leave this opportunity.
Explanation:
"The first set in the moon" has been written by an English author, H.G. Wells. It is a scientific romance written by this author. The novel tells the story of a journey to the Moon undertaken by the two protagonists, a businessman narrator, Mr. Bedford, and an eccentric scientist, Mr. Cavor.
Mr Cavor is in a dilemma that whether he should go to the moon or not and discover it but according to me this opportunity should not be missed. This is not an opportunity that bangs on the door again and again. So when it comes, it should be availed as soon as possible

Dr. King's main conception is the law is again being inequitable. Dr. King in paragraph 4 tells why he got apprehended and how the law is being inequitable,  " Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust."

In paragraph 6 Dr. King utilizes what Hitler did in Germany and shows how even back in that time it was inequitable. " It was "illegal" to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany."   When he tells us that, it shows how racist and inequitable those times were.

I had this question.

Let me know if this helped :0