brii1387
brii1387
25.01.2021 • 
English

George W. Bush delivered his "9/11 Address" less than 8 hours after the attacks were made in New York City and Washington, DC. He did not use a lot of specific details as proof in his speech. Do you think he should have included specific details of the attacks and the damages done as proof in his speech, or was it reasonable to leave it broad and general?

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question