If you are a buyer of sugar, would you rather there be more sugar and more sugar sellers or less sugar and fewer sugar sellers in the market? Why? (What do you think happens to the price of sugar when there is more sugar available? When there is less sugar available?) can someone just give me a short answer for this

Is sugar policy a sweet deal for consumers and producers in the sugar market? • Hints: Use your common sense and your experience to answer the following: • If you are a buyer of sugar, would you rather there be more sugar and more sugar sellers orless sugar and fewer sugar sellers in the market? Why? (Hint: What do you think happens tothe price of sugar when there is more sugar available? When there is less sugar available?) • If you are a sellerof sugar, would you rather there be more sugar and more sugar sellers orless sugar and fewer sugar sellers in the market? Why? (Hint: What do you think happens tothe price of sugar when there is more sugar available? When there is less sugar available?) Without a doubt it is an inclination for sugar creators. It's certainly not a sweet arrangement forclients who bear the more significant expenses of sugar. If there are more sugar and moresugar sellers or less sugar and less sugar shippers in the market then Buyers need there to bemore sugar accessible as that will deliver plunging pressure on expenses.

In my opinion I would say encrypted/decrypt. Plz mark as brainliest.