ani61

10.01.2020 • 

English

In a group discussion, which sentence is most clearly challenging the credibility of a source?
a. piracy is a sensitive issue, and it's unfortunate that peterson's book about it has been republished recently.
b. peterson's goal was to tell a story, not argue a point, so his opinions aren't really that important.
c. although peterson's comments may have been valid at one time, his book is over 30 years old.
d. when peterson calls the ship the ransom, he's clearly making a reference to modern piracy.

Ответ:

linaaaa0496

14.01.2022

English

---

In a group discussion, the sentence that is most clearly challenging the credibility of a source is C. Although Peterson's comments may have been valid at one time, his book is over 30 years old.
So this means that it used to be credible, but isn't anymore.

---

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

robert7248

09.11.2021

English

---

Claim- weak and too opinionated

Support- informal, gramaticly inaccurate, uses words like "cool" and "Totally", uses evidence from an irrelevant source

Conclusion- not really a conclusion. one sentence is not a conclusion and it doesn't sum up the rest of the argument.

pov- is written in first person when it should be written in third person.

Transitions- no transitions

---

0,0(0 оценок)