In paragraph 6 how does the author argue against bottom trawling on seamounts? A. By stating that there is coral in both deep and shallow waters
B. By describing that most fish populations are already overfished
C. By suggesting the effects are unknown because unidentified species are destroyed
D. By explaining that bottom trawls in the past could not reach so far undersea

read it carefully cuz if you don't you might misunderstand something and you don't want that cuz you have to look for the smallest details even the largest

Okay, so the square all sides are 7 so the diagonal using the 45-45-90 triangle theorem you can find that the diagonal is 7 times the square root of 2.  The diagonal of the rectangle can be found because it will divide the rectangle into 2 30-60-90 triangles.  The hypotenuse is 2 times the smallest side in a 30-60-90.  We know that the smallest side is 7.  So the hypotenuse is 14 (I think there is an error in the question).  We know this using the 30°-60°-90° Triangle Theorem.  Because 14 is not 2 times 7 times the square root of 2.  Anna is incorrect.  I think.