Kalanick’s way of leading was one that focused on doing whatever it took for his company to succeed, or power, whereas khosrowshahi’s way of leading is focused on growing and inspiring employees, or power.

The answer is coercive powerr and moral power, respectively.

Explanation:

Coercive power implies that a leader is able to apply punishment and other negative consequences for his/her workers, who will probably act under fear.

Moral power exhibits a leader who is taken as an inspiration for workers, possibly because he/she shows ethical leadership, and the workers may try to imitate the leader's behaviours. Under this type of power, a leader will be interested in his/her workers' needs and skills.

Synonyms:

Unnoticeable

Camouflaged

Concealed

Antonyms:

Noticeable

Visible

Conspicuous