Rewrite this passage to remove the error in logic that hurts the author's credibility. Passage
The whole city is littered with trash, and we need to do something about it. It's so bad that garbage is floating in the ocean and being washed up on our shores. If we can control our consumption and limit how much trash we generate, then we'll be able to combat this menace. Plastic bags should be banned because it is the only way that we can possibly clean up our city streets. Either we ban plastic bags, or we continue to live in filth and squalor.

The whole city is littered with trash, and we need to do something about it. It's so bad that garbage is floating in the ocean and being washed up on our shores. If we can control our consumption and limit how much trash we generate, then we should be able to combate this menace. This is the only way to clean up our city streets. Either we limit our waste, or we continue to live in filth and squalor.

Explination:

The statements that plastic bags are the only problem are problematic when following the provided solution of controling all waste. By removing the mention of plastic bags, you remove the error without loosing the meaning behind all trash generation being problematic.

It is A peoples

Explanation:

Just got it right on Edge Edge 2020-2021 :)